杭州电子科技大学图书馆书目检索系统

Online Public Access Catalogue

题名/责任者:

Family communication as... : exploring metaphors for family communication / edited by Jimmie Manning, Jordan Allen, Katherine J Denker.

出版发行项:

Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, c2023

ISBN:

9781119668398

ISBN:

1119668395

其它标准号:

40031536441

载体形态项:

xix, 229 pages : illustrations ; 26 cm

附加个人名称:

Manning, Jimmie, editor.

附加个人名称:

Allen, Jordan (Assistant professor of communication studies), editor.

附加个人名称:

Denker, Katherine J., editor.

论题主题:

Communication in families.

中图法分类号:

C913.11

书目附注:

Includes bibliographical references and index.

内容附注:

Machine generated contents note: 1. Family Communication as Choice: Thinking about and Theorizing Family / Jimmie Manning -- 2. Family Communication as Relationship / Mary Anne Fitzpatrick -- 3. Family Communication as Ritual / Robert D. Hall -- 4. Family Communication as Biology / Amanda Denes -- 5. Family Communication as Maintenance / Scott A. Myers -- 6. Family Communication as Transition / Glen H. Stamp -- 7. Family Communication as Social Identity / Morgan April -- 8. Family Communication as Heteronormative / Yachao Li -- 9. Family Communication as Raced / Megan E. Cardwetl -- 10. Family Communication as Embodied / Laura L. Ellingson -- 11. Family Communication as Performance / Nivea Castaneda -- 12. Family Communication as Narrative / Toni Morgan -- 13. Family Communication as Dialogue / Leah M. Seurer -- 14. Family Communication as Object Nishani: Mother Objects in Other Worlds / Devika Chawla -- 15. Family Communication as Memory / Robin M. Boylorn -- 16. Family Communication as Boundary / Jeffrey T. Child -- 17. Family Communication as Organization / Caryn E. Medved -- 18. Family Communication as Health / Christina G. Yoshimura -- 19. Family Communication as Mediated / Danielle M. Stern -- 20. Family Communication as (an) Art / Kimberly Kuiper -- 21. Family Communication as Argument / Erin S. Craw -- 22. Family Communication as Deviance / Elizabeth Dorrance Hall -- 23. Family Communication as Taboo / Amanda J. Holman -- 24. Family Communication as Failure / Jacqueline Emerine -- 25. Family Communication as Death / Jillian A. Tullis -- 26. Family Communication as Forgiveness / Vincent R. Waldron -- 27. Family Communication as Support / Michael Robert Dennis -- 28. Family Communication as Resilience / Allison Mazur.

摘要附注:

"Before the last half of the twentieth century, the phrase "family communication as relationship" would have struck a reader as unintelligible. Communication between and among family members was neither an object of scientific study nor a focus of individual reflection or cultural analysis. Moreover, according to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word relationship first appeared in 1744 but was not applied "specifically of romantic or sexual relationships" for another two hundred years. The field of communication made a turn to studying communication in relationships and the family during the late 1960s and 1970s as it abandoned the common but fairly bloodless definition of interpersonal communication as face-to-face communication between two people. Influenced by classic works in family systems theory, such as that by Satir (1972), Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson (1967), and Bateson (1972), the field adopted the metaphor of the family as a system of relationships built, maintained, changed, and destabilized through interaction. Within ten years, Galvin and Brommel (1982) had produced a textbook on family communication that could overview the extensive research analyzing patterns of interaction within families. Starting with couple interaction data (Gottman 1979), Gottman (2002) built a strong mathematical model for the metaphors of family interaction presented in the family system theories. Even though the metaphor of family communication as relationship has generated important research directions, some theorists argue that metaphors are imprecise, ambiguous, and therefore have no place in scientific discourse. But language, even much scientific language, is metaphorical because we discuss one thing in terms of another (Lakoff and Johnson 1980). Of course, literal statements (e.g., the cat sits on the mat) are possible but as soon as we move from concrete physical experience to talk about abstractions, we employ metaphor."--

豆瓣简介：